+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 34.3% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 160.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is $9.25 cheaper per million tokens. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
6 months newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o3
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($9.25 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:83.3%(+34.3%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Average Score:49.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:83.3%(+34.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Avg Score:49.0%
Providers:4