+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 11.9% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 44.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $9.60 cheaper per million tokens. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
13 days newer
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o3
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($9.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:89.0%(+11.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:77.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:89.0%(+11.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:77.1%
Providers:3