+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 7.1% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 168.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $8.35 cheaper per million tokens. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
4 months newer
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
o3
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($8.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:74.6%(+7.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:67.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:74.6%(+7.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:67.4%
Providers:1