+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o3 vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 15.1% higher average benchmark score. o3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
1 month newer
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:87.5%(+15.1%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:72.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 20ms
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:87.5%(+15.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:72.4%
Providers:0