+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
o4-mini vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o4-mini leads with 45.4% higher average benchmark score. o4-mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o4-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o4-mini is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2024 (93.4%), AIME 2025 (92.7%), MathVista (84.3%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.0% across 3 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (94.6%), AIME (57.5%), GPQA (52.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
14 days newer
o4-mini
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Average Score:58.2%(+45.4%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:12.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o4-mini
2024-05-31
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Avg Score:58.2%(+45.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:12.8%
Providers:0