+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct leads with 6.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Multimodal was created to handle multiple input modalities including text, images, and potentially other formats. Built to extend Phi-4's efficiency into multimodal applications, it demonstrates that compact models can successfully integrate diverse information types.
5 months newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:65.4%
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Average Score:72.2%(+6.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:65.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Avg Score:72.2%(+6.8%)
Providers:1