+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Pixtral-12B leads with 7.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Pixtral-12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
25 days newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:56.2%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:64.1%(+7.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:56.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:64.1%(+7.9%)
Providers:1