+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Pixtral Large leads with 17.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Pixtral Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
2 months newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:61.7%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:78.8%(+17.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:61.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:78.8%(+17.1%)
Providers:1