+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 26.8% higher average benchmark score. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.3% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ScienceQA (91.3%), POPE (86.1%), MMBench (81.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), HumanEval (88.4%), HellaSwag (85.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
27 days newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:22.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:49.5%(+26.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:22.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:49.5%(+26.8%)
Providers:0