+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct leads with 10.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2-VL 72B was developed as a large vision-language model, designed to handle multimodal tasks combining visual and textual understanding. Built with 72 billion parameters for integrated vision and language processing, it enables applications requiring sophisticated analysis of images alongside text.
6 days newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-08-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:76.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Average Score:86.9%(+10.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
2023-06-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:76.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Avg Score:86.9%(+10.0%)
Providers:0