+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads with 12.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
7 months newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:63.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:76.0%(+12.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:63.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:76.0%(+12.2%)
Providers:0