+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
5 months newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:69.7%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:78.8%(+9.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:69.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:78.8%(+9.1%)
Providers:0