+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads with 15.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
7 months newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:52.0%(+15.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:36.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:52.0%(+15.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:36.4%
Providers:1