+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Mini vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 5.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:64.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:69.9%(+5.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:64.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:69.9%(+5.9%)
Providers:0