+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Mini vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 5.7% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (88.6%), ARC-C (83.7%), BoolQ (81.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.9% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.7%), GSM8k (91.1%), MBPP (90.2%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:46.3%(+5.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:40.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:46.3%(+5.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:40.6%
Providers:4