+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Mini vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 61.0% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
2 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:93.8%(+61.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
3 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:93.8%(+61.0%)
Providers:3