+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 15.0% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning Plus was created as an enhanced reasoning variant, designed to provide even deeper analytical capabilities within the Phi-4 family. Built to maximize reasoning quality while maintaining the efficiency benefits of small models, it represents the most capable reasoning-focused option in the Phi-4 series.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Average Score:72.4%(+15.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:57.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Avg Score:72.4%(+15.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:57.4%
Providers:0