+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Reasoning vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 31.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
8 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:71.1%(+31.1%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:40.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:71.1%(+31.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:40.0%
Providers:0