+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 24.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
7 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:77.7%(+24.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:53.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:77.7%(+24.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:53.5%
Providers:0