+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 31.1% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:70.0%(+31.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:38.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:70.0%(+31.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:38.9%
Providers:0