+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 25.8% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 28 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.8%), Android Control Low_EM (93.3%), HumanEval (91.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Average performance across 37 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:22.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:48.1%(+25.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:22.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:48.1%(+25.8%)
Providers:0