+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B leads with 7.9% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 30B A3B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 30B A3B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B was created with a mixture-of-experts architecture featuring 30 billion total parameters and 3 billion active parameters. Built to provide strong capabilities with efficient inference through sparse activation, it balances performance with practical computational requirements.
1 days newer
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:66.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:74.1%(+7.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
3 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:66.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:74.1%(+7.9%)
Providers:3