+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning leads with 17.2% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 30B A3B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (91.0%), AIME 2024 (80.4%), LiveBench (74.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 days newer
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:59.0%(+17.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:41.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
3 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:59.0%(+17.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:41.9%
Providers:3