+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Pixtral-12B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 21.8% higher average benchmark score. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
2 days newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:63.1%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:84.9%(+21.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:63.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:84.9%(+21.8%)
Providers:0