+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Pixtral-12B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads with 22.3% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct offers 3.1K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
2 days newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.45 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:64.5%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Average Score:86.8%(+22.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:64.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Avg Score:86.8%(+22.3%)
Providers:4