+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Pixtral-12B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct offers 119.8K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Pixtral-12B supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.8% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (90.7%), ChartQA (81.8%), VQAv2 (78.6%). It supports a 136K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.9% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.7%), GSM8k (91.1%), MBPP (90.2%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 days newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($0.12 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:33.4%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:40.6%(+7.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:33.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:40.6%(+7.2%)
Providers:4