+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 15.1% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B offers 116.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
7 months newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Average Score:63.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:78.1%(+15.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
4 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 10 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 59 tok/s
Latency: 0.37ms
Hyperbolic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Together
Throughput: 47 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Avg Score:63.0%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:78.1%(+15.1%)
Providers:3