+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 39.3% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B offers 116.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
7 months newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:38.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:78.1%(+39.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 138 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:38.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:78.1%(+39.3%)
Providers:3