+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 25.5% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct offers 8.2K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is $1.05 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
11 months newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30($1.05 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:59.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:85.3%(+25.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 138 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:59.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:85.3%(+25.5%)
Providers:1