Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 23.6% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct offers 124.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $1.47 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
11 months newer

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Available providers and their performance metrics

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Lambda

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita