+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 34.5% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:49.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:84.1%(+34.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:49.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:84.1%(+34.5%)
Providers:1