+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 7.9% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:81.0%(+7.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:73.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:81.0%(+7.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:73.1%
Providers:4