+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:63.5%(+5.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:58.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:63.5%(+5.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:58.4%
Providers:0