+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 22.6% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
6 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:57.4%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:80.0%(+22.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:57.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:80.0%(+22.6%)
Providers:1