+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Qwen3-Next 80B, designed to combine large-scale mixture-of-experts architecture with reliable instruction-following. Built to demonstrate efficient deployment of capable models, it balances advanced performance with practical computational efficiency.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
Launched on the same date
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Average Score:66.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:71.9%(+6.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
1 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Avg Score:66.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:71.9%(+6.0%)
Providers:1