Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 14.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
4 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval