+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 18.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 183.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. GPT-4o is $77.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
9 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00($77.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:76.4%(+18.8%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:57.6%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Coding72.5%(+39.3%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Coding33.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:76.4%(+18.8%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:57.6%
Providers:2