Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
7 months newer

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval