+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini Diffusion
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 19.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available on 3 providers. Overall, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion was developed as a specialized model for image generation, designed to create high-quality visual content through diffusion-based techniques. Built to complement the text and multimodal capabilities of the Gemini family, it extends Google's AI capabilities into creative visual generation tasks.
7 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:70.0%(+19.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:51.0%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Coding49.0%(+26.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Coding22.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:70.0%(+19.0%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:51.0%
Providers:0