+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.6M more tokens in context window than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Llama 4 Maverick is $17.23 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
This upgraded version of Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released with significant improvements in coding and agentic tool use. Built to deliver enhanced performance in software engineering tasks, it brought substantial gains in reasoning and problem-solving while introducing the groundbreaking computer use capability in public beta, allowing it to interact with computer interfaces like a human.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
5 months newer
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
2024-10-22
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($17.23 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Average Score:80.8%(+0.7%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:80.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
3 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Avg Score:80.8%(+0.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:80.1%
Providers:7