+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 1.2% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
2 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:68.2%
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:69.4%(+1.2%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Coding70.3%
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Coding72.7%(+2.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:68.2%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:69.4%(+1.2%)
Providers:4