+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 3.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 786.1K more tokens in context window than Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
2 months newer
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50($15.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Average Score:73.0%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:76.6%(+3.6%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Coding70.3%(+9.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Coding60.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Avg Score:73.0%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:76.6%(+3.6%)
Providers:2