Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 21.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 183.6K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. GPT-4o is $5.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
6 months newer

GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT-4o

GPT-4o
Azure
OpenAI