Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 9.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 65.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $17.46 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
5 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT OSS 120B
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT OSS 120B

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT OSS 120B

GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval