Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 19.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 65.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 20B. GPT OSS 20B is $17.75 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 20B was created as a smaller open-source variant, designed to balance capability with accessibility for researchers and developers. Built with 20 billion parameters, it provides a more approachable entry point for those seeking to work with open-source language models while benefiting from OpenAI's architectural insights.
5 months newer

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24

GPT OSS 20B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT OSS 20B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT OSS 20B
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT OSS 20B

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

GPT OSS 20B

GPT OSS 20B
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval