Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 8.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 28.0K more tokens in context window than o1. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is $57.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
2 months newer

o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1

o1
Azure
OpenAI