Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 15.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 134.5K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. o1-mini is $3.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
5 months newer

o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1-mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1-mini
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1-mini

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o1-mini

o1-mini
Azure
OpenAI