Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 11.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers 28.0K more tokens in context window than o3-mini. o3-mini is $12.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents Anthropic's first hybrid reasoning model, capable of producing near-instant responses or extended step-by-step thinking that is visible to users. Developed with particularly strong improvements in coding and front-end web development, it allows users to control thinking budgets and balances real-world task performance with reasoning capabilities for enterprise applications.
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
25 days newer

o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
2025-02-24
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o3-mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o3-mini
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o3-mini
o3-mini
2023-09-30
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o3-mini

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

o3-mini

o3-mini
Azure
OpenAI