Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 leads with 12.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.6 offers 64.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Haiku 4.5. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $24.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Opus 4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5, released by Anthropic in October 2025, is a fast, efficient large language model from the Claude 4.5 family optimized for high-throughput, low-latency workloads. It features a 200K token context window, 64K maximum output tokens, native image understanding, and extended thinking capabilities. Haiku 4.5 targets latency-sensitive applications such as real-time assistants, document classification, and lightweight agentic tasks where rapid response times are a primary requirement.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6, released by Anthropic in February 2026, is a large language model from the Claude 4 family designed for complex agent orchestration, extended reasoning, and long-form code generation. It features a 200K token context window (extendable to 1M tokens in beta), 128K maximum output tokens, native image understanding, and extended thinking with both standard and adaptive effort modes. Opus 4.6 targets multi-step agentic workflows, parallel tool use, and applications requiring sustained reasoning over large contexts.
4 months newer

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-01

Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
2026-02
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02
Claude Opus 4.6
2025-05
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
AWS Bedrock
Google Cloud Vertex AI
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
AWS Bedrock
Google Cloud Vertex AI