+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek-R1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 137.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1. DeepSeek-R1 is $3.26 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-R1 is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1 was developed as a reasoning-focused language model, designed to combine chain-of-thought reasoning with reinforcement learning techniques. Built to excel at complex problem-solving through trial-and-error learning and deliberate analytical processes, it demonstrates the power of efficient training methods in open-source model development.
8 months newer
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Input:$1.00
Output:$5.00
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Input:$0.55
Output:$2.19($3.26 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:5