Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 714.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Haiku 4.5. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $3.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
4 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Claude Haiku 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval